From Interpersonal to Large-Group Mediation – Differences, Added Dimensions?byEdward Howden Number of interests and issues often greater More persons interacting, both within each contending group and between the groups – so more variables, greater complexity of process Decision-making more cumbersome and problematic, intra-party and inter-party Cross-cultural tensions, misunderstandings add complexities, may roughen road to consensus – mediators’ sensitivities imperative Multi-party disputes place still greater demands on the process Difficult for some parties to move away from accustomed arenas of public battling, pressure tactics, media exploitation, etc. and into the quieter, non-public mediation chamber In some cases mediators may need to take into account serious power imbalances between the parties Assuring continuing compliance with an agreement may be more difficult More demanding on mediators in terms of a) overall time demands b) complexities of schedule-setting, to accommodate everyone (often evenings or weekends) c) mediators' energies, stamina, patience, creativity Added commitment of agency staff, along with volunteers, may become essential Greater mediator responsibility to try to attend to representation of all key interest groups or stakeholders |
|
|
|
by Conflict Management Initiatives and the Conflict Information Consortium Beyond Intractability maintains this legacy site as it was created in 2007 with only minor formatting changes made in conjunction with the posting of Phase II of the Civil RIghts Mediation project in 2025. |
|
|
|
|
|
by Conflict Management Initiatives and the Conflict Information Consortium Beyond Intractability maintains this legacy site as it was created in 2007 with only minor formatting changes made in conjunction with the posting of Phase II of the Civil RIghts Mediation project in 2025. |
|
|