Angel Alderete[Full Interview] [Topic Top] For example, I was there as a conflict management manager, but also the regional director was there to do what he was doing before. So now when you have a problem of conflict, that would come under my jurisdiction. That, of course, sent the regional director through the roof. From that point on, my group would respond solely to conflict problems. We did some training of staff, in terms of what it was that we had gained from our own training, but not enough. Even at our annual trek back to Washington, there was a division between the Conflict Resolution people and the rest of the agency. That really isn't good for cooperation. So then we got involved in kinds of situations that our own experience and expertise sort of propelled us to. In some cases that expertise propelled us to the agency. Bob Ensley[Full Interview] [Topic Top] but at the time I joined CRS as a special, the Judge Pratt decision was a big issue. During that time, it was decided that, because of the unrest in the Southeast and in many other areas of the country, they needed to organize a crisis response team -- a team that would respond to crises as opposed to involving ourselves in five programmatic areas: education, housing, administration, justice, and economic development. So somehow or another, I was selected to become part of the crisis response team and we would respond to the crisis and then bring the mediators in to do the mediation work. We would set the tone, temperament, and the ground work, and bring the mediators in. They would then move toward a mediation agreement or some sort of conciliation agreement. But most of the time we could, in fact, resolve it through the conciliation. That did not require a signed agreement, as mediation often does. This is primarily the way we function. Wallace Warfield[Full Interview] [Topic Top] A fellow by the name of Victor Risso and I opened the New York office. At this time, CRS was just beginning to spread out, because Congress and the white House were becoming increasingly concerned about the series of riots that were taking place after the death of Dr. King. They recognized the fact that service could not be provided much beyond the fire-engine model working out of Washington D.C. The logic was that being closer to the action with field offices would provide better access, and therefore better service. So, Vic and I opened up the New York regional office, which was supposed to respond to disputes and conflicts everywhere within what’s now designated as Region 1, consisting of all of the New England region, Region 2, New York, New Jersey, and then also at that time Region 3, which included Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, and Washington, D.C., Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands – they just sort of threw those last ones in as well, you know. Well, of course, the agency actually expanded the regions later. We got more staff, and then it began to sort of actually go from what had been five large geographical divisions, to ten regional offices, in order to conform to the typical federal setup. So I started out as a conciliator in the New York office, working all over, just doing various kinds of what was called conciliation. In those days, mediation had not really taken hold in the community conflict arena. It was mainly called conciliation work. The truth of the matter is that it really was a useful distinction, because there really wasn’t much in the way of formal mediation, per se, taking place in the early days, since much of CRS was still in a reactive, crisis-response mode. We flew into all sorts of places, literally or metaphorically, laid hands on people, dealt with an immediate conflict situation and then flew out. The economy would not allow for much more than that. In its earliest configurations, CRS had 50 people. Then, as the regions began to grow, I went from being the Conciliation Specialist to the Deputy Regional Director, and then I became the Acting Regional Director. So I stayed at the New York office from ‘68 until ‘79. Then the fellow who was the deputy director of CRS at the time asked me if I would come to Washington to be the Associate Director for Field Coordination, and so I did. From ‘79 until 1986 when Gill Pompa died, I was Associate Director for Field Coordination. When Gill died, the Attorney General asked me to take on the position of the Acting Director of CRS, which is where I remained until September of 1988. When it became clear that I was not going to get the official appointment as the Director of CRS, I decided to segue. So I left CRS and joined, as kind of a government transfer, the Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS) which is no longer in existence. ACUS was, as you know, a relatively small, arcane federal agency involved in administrative disputes. They tried to determine how to make administrative disputes less litigious and less costly. ACUS became interested in the Conflict Research field as a mechanism for doing this, and so I came over as Distinguished Visiting Fellow, to bring a perspective from the community into what was largely legal and administrative disputes. I found out that the transition could work. There were lots of things that I could apply. So here I was, coming from a community conflict-resolution agency, into an agency that was dominated primarily by lawyers looking at administrative disputes, and I had a great time. I learned how to do interesting legal research, trained administrative law judges and staff of federal agencies, and at the time was also involved in the very beginnings of the Regulatory Negotiation process. I also helped to write the first 1990 Omnibus Dispute Resolution Act. While this was happening, I was also doing these kinds of casual little moonlightings at this new program, then called the Center of Conflict Analysis and Resolution. It had just started at George Mason University, and the clinical part of it was just getting started by my old colleague and friend Jim Laue, who used to be at the Community Relations Service. So, it was a very incestuous network of people involved at this time. I found that I enjoyed teaching, and that I had something to offer. Students seemed to resonate with me as I did with them. In 1990, I was 50 years old, and serendipity being what it is, I took an opportunity to take an early retirement. At the same time, the then Institute of Conflict Analysis and Resolution offered me a position on the clinical faculty, and I made that transition. That’s where I’ve been ever since. Dick Salem[Full Interview] [Topic Top] I was hired to be Midwest Regional Director in Chicago. At the time, there were only four regions; this was the fourth. Dick Salem[Full Interview] [Topic Top] Answer: Nancy Ferrell[Full Interview] [Topic Top] Question: Answer: Nancy Ferrell[Full Interview] [Topic Top] Answer: |
Martin Walsh[Full Interview] [Topic Top] You started off in Washington? Answer: Question: Answer: Question: Answer: Stephen Thom[Full Interview] [Topic Top] Stephen, tell us what your position is at CRS. Answer: Stephen Thom[Full Interview] [Topic Top] Well, I'll just give you the types of cases I've had and you might have a question about one of these. Native-American and governance disputes, police and Native-American shootings, police and African-American shootings, Asian-, Latin- and African-American shootings, corporate and repatriation, corporate and Asian customer protection, Asian and African business customer community dispute, school suspension/expulsion, racial slurs/jokes, police and school hiring promotions, ethnic studies threatened, affirmative action demonstrations, marches, sit-ins, hunger strikes, site-based management disputes between parents and school personnel, gang violence and police response, recruitment of minorities, discrimination in fire departments, Head Start closures and community, city governance and community, Latin community in FEMA, students after riots, shootings and retaliations. I think the principles used in each of these cases were the same. And the key is to thoroughly understand the mediation process. |
Angel Alderete[Full Interview] [Topic Top] I worked there for about a year and then I got promoted to the lofty position of Supervisor. So I had two or three people working for me: an attorney and two conciliation specialists. We were responsible for the entire region in terms of dealing with conflict resolution. Angel Alderete[Full Interview] [Topic Top] But about 1972 or 1973, the axe fell and we lost a great number of staff people. Nationwide, I think we initially had roughly four hundred staff people, and we were cut down a lot. When we got chopped up, of course they went by the amount of time each person had with that agency, so I lost my position and stepped down to Conciliator. They brought my group in with the rest of the region, which, more than likely, should have been done long before. From then on, I began to get involved mostly in correctional and law enforcement kinds of problems, not only within my region but also within other regions. I sometimes would get a call from Seattle to come in and provide some kind of technical assistance to them with some of the things that they were doing. Bob Ensley[Full Interview] [Topic Top] What were you hired as? Answer: Edward Howden[Full Interview] [Topic Top] Question: Answer: Ernest Jones[Full Interview] [Topic Top] Question: Answer: Question: Answer: Manuel Salinas[Full Interview] [Topic Top] Question: Answer: Ozell Sutton[Full Interview] [Topic Top] Question: Answer: Question: Answer: Question: Answer: Question: Answer: Dick Salem[Full Interview] [Topic Top] Answer: |
Angel Alderete[Full Interview] [Topic Top] When I got involved with the California Department of Corrections, he was the first fellow I went to. This happened roughly about 1973, right after I got demoted into another position at CRS because mine was done away with. Ernest Jones[Full Interview] [Topic Top] Question: Answer: |
|
|
|
by Conflict Management Initiatives and the Conflict Information Consortium Beyond Intractability maintains this legacy site as it was created in 2007 with only minor formatting changes made in conjunction with the posting of Phase II of the Civil RIghts Mediation project in 2025. |
|
|
|
|
|
by Conflict Management Initiatives and the Conflict Information Consortium Beyond Intractability maintains this legacy site as it was created in 2007 with only minor formatting changes made in conjunction with the posting of Phase II of the Civil RIghts Mediation project in 2025. |
|
|